This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
2020 New Zealand euthanasia referendum is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
> The public will get to vote on whether to legalise voluntary euthanasia as New Zealand First threatened to vote down the legislation if it did not go to a referendum, while the Green party demanded more safeguards to ensure that only terminally ill patients would be covered, and could not be coerced. The decision to go to a referendum passed 69–51.
The preceding section of text should probably be moved to the Background section of the article, as it is background on why the referendum exists, instead of being part of the referendum itself. BrythonLexi (talk) 01:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Quite right, thank you, and I moved it before even seeing the comment above (and edited the text because the bit about Greens has nothing to do with the referendum). Nurg (talk) 04:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
.JPG)
