Talk:2020 State of the Union Address

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 177.230.47.65 in topic 44th white president

Pelosi tear-up of the POTUS personally presented hard-copy of SOTU address speech = an "event" or an invalid acknowledged "gesture"

edit

reportedly, Pelosi took the torn up copy of the speech and as she walked out through the chamber, she waved the torn pages to family, friends and democrat base. Captured in a video, she was questioned about doing this. She indicated that she did it as "well it was a courteous thing to do". 174.158.56.141 (talk) 04:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • the Pelosi response: "well it was a courteous thing to do" is all I've seen so far in the videos published on line... Is the article factual as published? where is the footage covering the following quote "...considering the alternatives. It was a such a dirty speech" ??? 174.158.62.157 (talk) 04:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • the Pelosi response: "well it was a courteous thing to do" is all I've seen so far on TV, as well. The wiki article may be misleading at best, or incorrect at worst, regarding this documented event / "gesture". 174.158.35.46 (talk) 05:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

44th white president

edit

Should the lead mention that Trump is the 44th white president?47.137.181.252 (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Trump's third SOTU? Or just the second?

edit

From State of the Union: Newly inaugurated presidents generally deliver an address to Congress in February of the first year of their term, but this speech is not officially considered to be a "State of the Union". —⁠184.207.145.12 (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ah, crap! Trump has been in office a little over three years, but that means he's begun his fourth year in office, and 4 - 1 = 3. So, never mind the above. —⁠184.207.145.12 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The bias of Wikipedia in is dumbfounding: Selective reporting of facts

edit

Everybody has always known Wikipedia is Liberally-biased, but are the editors here really going to ignore the fact that Pelosi ripped the President's speech (and it's massive backlash) and that she started doing so before it was even delivered?
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3


How biased is this thing really is?
Cheers from Mexico.
--177.230.47.65 (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply