Talk:2021 Budapest W Series round
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Tone
edit@MSportWiki: Per WP:TONE, WP:NEWSSTYLE and other advice on that page, Wikipedia articles should be written in a formal tone, and without hyperbolic adjectives and adverbs. The wording of the report section is distinctly encyclopaedic - "Chadwick stormed away from pole position" &c. Presumably the same issue attends to all of the W Series articles added on the 24th Jan 2022.
Rhetorical flourishes like "Ayla Ågren and Fabienne Wohlwend ran wide – the Norwegian slowed" also fall flat, insofar as the reader probably doesn't have a clue who "the Norwegian" is.
So. This is an encyclopedia, not a sports magazine or tabloid newspaper. Please consider adjusting the style used. I’m
I note, also, no references for the Report section. That, too, is poor. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- It’s “distinctly encyclopaedic”? Amazing. Seasider53 (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)