| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2021 Natanz incident article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Tag
edit@RoanokeVirginia: Hi, can you clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does seem to have Neutrality and spelling problems? thanks. M1nhm (talk) 10:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @M1nhm I have corrected a number of the spelling errors, although some may persist, which you can see in the articles history for reference.
- In terms of neutrality, one of the main issues, is that the article refers to what happened as an incident, an attack, and an accident without consistency or explanation. If this could be explained or made uniform this would be a big improvement. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 10:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- I tried to review the article and fixed the problem that was mentioned by you. this article is about the 2021 Natanz incident including incident, damage, and reactions after that. can you explain what do you mean by multiple issues? M1nhm (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)