Talk:2021 Summer World University Games
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editHosting offers Universiade Summer 2021: Budapest who competed for hosting in 2019, may have to face again. Cape Town-South Africa may also face up. Cali-Columbia was also interested.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.137.232 (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
withdrawn teams or controversy
editshould info about india withdrawing their Wushu Team be summarized under withdrawn teams (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2021_Summer_World_University_Games&diff=prev&oldid=1168057664) or have a long edit about the controversy under it's own section + three citations when info can be found in one article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2021_Summer_World_University_Games&diff=prev&oldid=1168050522)?
user sportsfan 1234 keeps removing my edits, which i've modified, without providing any valid reasons.
- Clearly a separate section is warranted, if you take a look at other MSE events they all have concerns sections to have a neutral POV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- According to WP:NPOV - info must be proportinately represented. the indian wushu team withdrawing due to territorial disputes does not warrant an entire lengthy paragraph, quotes from indian politicians, and three sources when info can be found in the first source provided. users could add quotes from Chinese policians, creating a lengthy article about territorial disputes instead of info about a collegiate sporting event. I've created a header called "withdrawn teams" and included a brief summary of what happened. info would be more appropriate in an article about sino-indian disputes, not collegiate sports.
- this dispute will need the other input of other users. LilAhok (talk) 00:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Somali runner controversy
editShould the controversy about the Somali runner Nasra Abubakar Ali who completed the 100m race in 21.81 seconds be added under the controversies section? SpicyTofuNoodles (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- It deserves a mention I think, given that it led to the dismissal of a high-level official, but it might be better placed on the specific Athletics page. 102.22.192.242 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)