Talk:2021 Syrian presidential election
A news item involving 2021 Syrian presidential election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 May 2021. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Are there pictures of the other candidates?
editIt would be nice to expand the article with these people's faces, if anyone knows about them, maybe from Arabic sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmilePersaud 15:07, 23 May 2021 (UTC) Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmilePersaud 03:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- You mean their obit photos?
Someone add ongoing events please
editElections are today and so this article will from this point on be heavily modified each hour, im not sure how to change this myself, as trying the command did nothing, if someone can do this for me I would appreciate that, thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmilePersaud 03:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmilePersaud (talk • contribs)
Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmilePersaud 14:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmilePersaud (talk • contribs)
Source for where expatriate voting was allowed
editThere is a long list of where expatriate voting was allowed and a short list of where it wasn't. What are the sources for this? BobFromBrockley (talk) 21:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Please observe Wikipedia policies and guidelines and respect the encyclopedic style
editPlease, if you hate Assad or whatever, take a few minutes to review pages like WP:NPOV and MOS:CLAIM before editing. Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia and should be written from a neutral POV. Thanks, Notrium (talk) 12:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Candidates in infobox
editre this edit by Number 57: it seems to refer to a policy that we only include candidates who get over 5% (I can't find the policy, but that's not my area of WP), but it seems to me that this policy would be extremely useful in elections where there are multiple candidates, but is less useful in this election where there were only three candidates. This was the second election in Syria where there was actually more than one candidate. It seems to me important to show the three candidates. I note that the previous election also had three candidates but there are only two in the infobox, but that the second candidate only got 4.4% of the vote. The 5% rule, in other words, seems arbitrary and not so useful for Syria's election. Thoughts? BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- The 5% rule allows second candidates where the second-placed candidate receives less than 5% of the vote (see here for a relatively recent discussion confirming the rule's existence). Cheers, Number 57 11:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Number 57, that's very helpful. I see the closing says "with the caveats that 1) different principles may apply to parliamentary/party-list elections and 2) as always, appropriate exceptions may be made via local consensus." I think that the rule is generally sensible but that this case (and 2014) would be exceptional so wonder if there's a local consensus for deviating from it here? BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm torn tbh; I can see your point, but also have an OCD-ish thing about consistency and rules... What do others watching this page think? (PS, I watch this page, so no need to ping me). Cheers, Number 57 00:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Number 57, that's very helpful. I see the closing says "with the caveats that 1) different principles may apply to parliamentary/party-list elections and 2) as always, appropriate exceptions may be made via local consensus." I think that the rule is generally sensible but that this case (and 2014) would be exceptional so wonder if there's a local consensus for deviating from it here? BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)