Talk:2021 WTA Tour
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problem with updating the singles and doubles rankings regularly on a weekly basis
editHello, fellow tennis enthusiasts,
I have noticed that over the past couple months there has been irregular update of the singles and doubles WTA rankings. In the edit source it only says the following: Current WTA Singles Rankings in boxed brackets. How do you update such a thing? I would rather make a brand new table and update the rankings myself, but it sounds tedious and I am, therefore, reluctant to change the way of editing. So, here is my request to those, who do have access to the WTA rankings editing, please, update the rankings on a regular weekly basis.
Qwerty284651 (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Qwerty284651:
{{Current WTA Singles Rankings}}
means that Template:Current WTA Singles Rankings is transcluded. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Table font size disparity between ATP and WTA
editI only just noticed this for some reason, but apparently the WTA tour Schedule tables have font size set to 85%, whereas ATP have font size set to 95%. This seems to be consistent across years for the ATP, but seems to have changed to 85% for the WTA from 2012 onwards. Is there a reason for this? If not (my working theory is that it was a typo that nobody noticed), I'm proposing to make font sizes consistent across ATP and WTA. I'm not sure if this is the best place to put this comment, but since this is the page I first realised it I'll stick it here and hopefully someone will note it. Also, which out of 85% and 95% should be the preferred standard? Jimthree60 (talk) 06:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)