Talk:2022–2024 Pakistan political unrest
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the 2022–2023 Pakistani political crises page were merged into 2022–2024 Pakistan political unrest on 11 May 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge of 2022 Pakistani political crises into 2022–2023 Pakistan political unrest
editWP:DUP: The two articles cover exactly the same subject. However, the article "Pakistan political unrest" is better written and referenced than the article "2022 Pakistani political crises". Fontaine347 (talk) 11:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Provided current article's information, paragraphs be not changed in case of merger, in that case yes, merger would be a viable decision. Wiki-political-pk (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support crisis is ongoing.
- Panam2014 (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support as the May 9, 2023 arrest of Imran Kahn will bring numerous readers and a merger will eliminate having two similar articles on the topic. Also agree with Fontaine347 that the article the article "Pakistan political unrest" is in better condition. Jusdafax (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- 2022 Azadi March II and 2022 Azadi March I can be kept separate, they seem to be different marches. But 2023 Imran Khan arrest attempts and 2023 Pakistani protests should be merged.--Fontaine347 (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with Fontaine347. Jusdafax (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- 2022 Azadi March II and 2022 Azadi March I can be kept separate, they seem to be different marches. But 2023 Imran Khan arrest attempts and 2023 Pakistani protests should be merged.--Fontaine347 (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AND BEING BAISED
editDear Administrator,
I am writing to bring to your attention a serious issue on a Wikipedia article that requires your attention. An editor has removed well-documented references to gross human rights violations from the article and accused me of bias when I added them back. Additionally, the same editor has placed a neutrality tag on the article without proper discussion or consensus.
As you are aware, Wikipedia has a strong commitment to neutrality and accuracy, and it is important that we do not ignore or suppress information that is relevant to the topic of an article. The human rights violations I added to the article are well-documented and should not be ignored or minimized.
I respectfully request that you look into this matter and take appropriate action. It appears that the editor in question is not adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If necessary, I am willing to participate in any discussion or mediation that can help resolve this issue.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Wiki-political-pk (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
WP;C-Class
editWikipedia:Content assessment/C-Class criteria : Following article has more than 70 citations, need a review
Importance scale from Low to Top
editIt is an ongoing crisis and deserves a Top Importance in Pakistan's section
The Intercept claim
editThe Intercept claim about the alleged diplomatic should not be taken at face value as fact no evidence has been provided for such claim and this is clearly NPOV. It should say some like "alleged unverified cable" Monochromemelo1 (talk) 23:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Political unrest is ongoing in 2024
editThe political unrest is ongoing as of 2024 from Allegations of rigging in the 2024 Pakistani general election to recent November 2024 Islamabad unrest so I think it should be renamed to 2022-2024 Pakistan political unrest. Muneebll (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you are able to add all the content from 2024, it can be done. Titan2456 (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)