Talk:2022 Cure Bowl/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SpaceEconomist192 (talk · contribs) 17:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- @PCN02WPS: Hi. Just to let you know that the review is done and the article has been placed on hold.
- @PCN02WPS: Hello, more than 7 days have passed since I've put the article on hold. Please try to address the suggestions as quickly as possible, otherwise I'll have to fail the article. Many thanks. SpaceEconomist192 ✐ 20:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll try to get to this as soon as I finish up with the Gasparilla Bowl review. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, since so many days have passed and no improvements have been made; I'll have to fail this article. If you want, when you have more time, you can renominate it and continue the review where it we left. It was nice working with you. The Blue Rider 08:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
A good article is—
- Well-written:
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
- Verifiable with no original research:
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
- (c) it contains no original research; and
- (d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
- Broad in its coverage:
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. [4]
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: [5]
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]
Review
edit- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Removed all. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Per MOS:INTRO, the lead section should be accessible to a broad audience. The 2nd paragraph has way too much football terminology, I couldn't understand whole sentences. If possible, try to substitute jargon like punt, drive, fumble, safety and turnover to layman's terms.
This sentence is confusing,
|
ω Awaiting |
(b) (MoS) | ...representing Conference USA (C–USA), began. The wikilink from «Conference USA» is repeated, remove it.
Per MOS:LEADCITE, inline citations in the lead section should be avoided if possible. The two inline citations in |
ω Awaiting |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) |
Checked references #1, #2, #3, #4, #12, #15, #22, #39 and #41 of this version. Isn't there an official ESPN source for the referee instead of the #3 source (Football Zebras)? The #4 source (College Football Poll) doesn't seem reliable for that kind of information. The #12 source (KSAT) doesn't state that it was UTSA first win. |
ω Awaiting |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | The game was played at Exploria Stadium in Orlando, Florida, and weather at kickoff was sunny with a temperature of 66 °F (19 °C).This needs an inline citation.
The attendance number stated in the infobox needs a source. |
ω Awaiting |
(c) (original research) | After the Roadrunners gained only one total yard on their next three plays, they were forced to attempt another fourth down conversion, and this one was also unsuccessful.. This might be original research but I know nothing about this sport. Is the team obliged to do a fourth down conversion or do they have more options of possible plays? |
ω Awaiting |
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | Earwig's Copyvio Detector says violation unlikely (5,7%). | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | ...the game usually features teams from the Mid-American Conference and the Sun Belt Conference; however, this season's matchup featured a team from Conference USA.Why was a team from Conference USA picked instead of one from Mid-American Conference? An explanation should be in the article.
A post-match section should be included in the article. Don't forget to update the lead afterwards. |
ω Awaiting |
(b) (focused) | ...in a game visited by College GameDay. Why is the fact that College GameDay broadcasted that specific game relevant to the article? If it isn't, I advise its removal.
|
ω Awaiting |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
...began their season with a thrilling triple-overtime..., «thrilling» is a peacock term, it needs to be removed.
|
ω Awaiting |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Everything peaceful | Pass |
Result
editResult | Notes |
---|---|
On hold | The reviewer has left no comments here |
- ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
- ^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
- ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
- ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
- ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
- ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.