Talk:2022 North Ayrshire Council election
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Asheiou in topic GA Review
2022 North Ayrshire Council election has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 12, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 North Ayrshire Council election/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Asheiou (talk · contribs) 20:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
On initial inspection, there are no glaring issues. The article seems a decent length and like it covers the relevant points.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- No issues.
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- Citations are all from established local news outlets or the local council.
- c. (OR):
- No original research as far as I can see.
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- I can't find any copyvio or plagiarism.
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- The context around the election is broad but not overly so.
- b. (focused):
- Per-ward election results are set out in a very easy-to-read way.
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- This serves as an accurate account of events.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- One of the most stable edit histories I've ever seen - all edits are constructive and there are no edit wars.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- No images.
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- N/A
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Everything looks good!
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.