Talk:2022 U.S. Open Cup final
Latest comment: 2 years ago by CSJJ104 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from 2022 U.S. Open Cup final appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 October 2022, and was viewed approximately 9,351 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
... that the 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final is the first to feature a non-Major League Soccer team in 14 years? Source: USL ChampionshipALT1: ... that tonight's U.S. Open Cup Final is the first in 14 years to feature a non-Major League Soccer team? Source: USL Championship- Reviewed: Launch and commissioning of the James Webb Space Telescope
- Comment: Still working on this one. Would like this to run on September 7 (the day of the match) with ALT1, otherwise ALT0 works.
Created by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 05:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC).
The article is long and new enough, well-sourced and well-referenced. No copyvio was observed. The hook is just interesting, short enough, backed by a reliable source both in the article and here. After the QPQ is provided, we can go with ALT1the original hook. --Mhhossein talk 10:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)- @Mhhossein: QPQ added. Still working on expanding the article. SounderBruce 23:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce: Do you want me to review the page once the expansion job is finished? --Mhhossein talk 12:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: That would be preferable. In its current state it doesn't actually qualify (as it is missing some citations). SounderBruce 04:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- So please let me know where you're done. --Mhhossein talk 04:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: That would be preferable. In its current state it doesn't actually qualify (as it is missing some citations). SounderBruce 04:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce: Do you want me to review the page once the expansion job is finished? --Mhhossein talk 12:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: QPQ added. Still working on expanding the article. SounderBruce 23:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: The article is now ready for a proper review. SounderBruce 00:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
QPQ is provided and the expansion is cool. Gtg with the original hook. --Mhhossein talk 12:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see anywhere in the cited source (https://www.uslchampionship.com/news_article/show/1234029) which supports either hook. Am I just missing something? -- RoySmith (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- SounderBruce Mhhossein SL93 (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's stated with the following line: "which saw Republic FC become the first lower-division club to reach the Final since fellow current USL Championship club the Charleston Battery in 2008." As the final has already passed, perhaps I can write up some new hooks for approval? SounderBruce 22:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Got it, that's fine as it is. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The very last sentence in the article needs a citation before this can be promoted. CSJJ104 (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Got it, that's fine as it is. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's stated with the following line: "which saw Republic FC become the first lower-division club to reach the Final since fellow current USL Championship club the Charleston Battery in 2008." As the final has already passed, perhaps I can write up some new hooks for approval? SounderBruce 22:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- SounderBruce Mhhossein SL93 (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
New hooks, now that the article is fully cited and mostly updated:
- ALT2: ... that the 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final was the first to feature a non-Major League Soccer team in 14 years? Source: Sports Illustrated
- ALT3: ... that the 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final was the first in 14 years to feature a non-Major League Soccer team? Source: USL Championship
ALT4: ... that Sacramento Republic FC reached the 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final by defeating teams from four divisions of American soccer? Fox40
@RoySmith: Should this be good to go? SounderBruce 06:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- I can't find where ALT4 is supported by the source, but ALT2 and ALT3 check out, so this is good to go with either of those. It's not techniclaly a DYK disqualifier, but something is funky with how the "Details" section is formatted. That needs to be fixed, but I won't hold up the DYK approval. What's with the "onlyinclude" tag? -- RoySmith (talk) 13:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- ALT4 is backed up by the listing of results sprinkled through the article, which mentions each league (USL League Two, USL-1, USL Championship, MLS). The onlyinclude tag is to allow the result to be transcluded onto the parent competition article (2022 U.S. Open Cup) and is normal for soccer finals. SounderBruce 19:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)