Talk:2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Why was an error added?
editHello there. I just noticed that @Arcahaeoindris added an undue weight error to the article, and also made a few contributions to it as well, can you explain why you did this? Also, I will try to find positive reactions to COP27, to fix the undue weight error, and to improve the article.
Sincerely, Thenewright22 (talk) 03:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
@Thenewright22: hi there, thanks for taking this here. The issue is that the majority of the article's length is currently dedicated to criticism or controversies and the summit has not even commenced yet. I tried to add a summary of what is planned to be discussed to balance this better, which was also just removed without explanation. even though there has been a lot of controversy over this, it cannot take up so much of the article. I tried to do this through expanding further background info such as the planned discussion, location, preparation, etc. The section should also be named "Reception" as this is more neutral as per WP:POV. please see WP:CRIT Arcahaeoindris (talk) 08:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining! I also started a new section, called "Positive Reception", and added one sentence, saying that the United States supports COP27. Also, do you use he, she, they or any other pronouns? (I use he)
- Sincerely, Thenewright22 (talk) 08:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I think the content in "positive reception" could be in "preparation" instead as it doesnt rly relate to reception. There also dont need to be separate sections for negative and positive reception. Take a look at WP:CRIT or even the section in the COP26 page. And I use he, thx for asking! Cheers Arcahaeoindris (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for suggesting improvements to my edits, I'll do that soon.
- Sincerely, Thenewright22 (talk) 23:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- As you suggested, I moved the sentence about how the US supports COP27 to the preparation section. Thanks again, for showing me how to improve the article.
- Sincerely, Thenewright22 (talk) 04:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
What the "F" ?
editWhat does the "F" in the "UNFCCC" stand for? 2600:8800:204:C400:E06E:D17B:5F84:AC44 (talk) 06:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Isn’t the link in the info box clickable on your device? F= Not a Forum. F = No Fun on this talk page.Chidgk1 (talk) 09:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2023 and 15 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mayaworthing (article contribs). Peer reviewers: GardenerOfMen, AllisonStacho.
— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)