Talk:2023–24 College Football Playoff/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 07:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 04:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello PCN02WPS, I'll review this for GA status.  750h+ | Talk  04:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sections

edit

Lead

edit
  • By virtue of their victories, Michigan and Washington faced each other in the national championship game, held on January 8 in Houston. Change "By virtue of" to "Because of" or "As a result of" (some people might not instantly understand what that means.  750h+ | Talk  04:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • ...College Football Playoff poll playing in two semifinals with the winners of each... add a comma after "semifinals".  750h+ | Talk  04:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Significant media criticism arose from the exclusion of Florida State, the first undefeated Power Five conference champion to be left out of the CFP. For conciseness, maybe rephrase this to "Significant media criticism arose from Florida State's exclusion, the first undefeated Power Five conference champion left out of the CFP."  750h+ | Talk  04:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bracket

edit

Selection and teams

edit

Playoff games

edit
Semifinals
edit
Sugar Bowl
edit
Championship
edit

Aftermath

edit

Source review

edit
  • Florida State, who lost their starting quarterback Jordan Travis in their next-to-last regular season game against North Alabama, is supported by reference 12, confirmed.
  • The Longhorns' sole loss had come by four points to No. 12 Oklahoma. is supported by reference 23, confirmed.
  • ACC commissioner Jim Phillips also criticized the committee, calling the decision "unfathomable". is supported by reference 27, confirmed.
  • All is supported by reliable sources, so that is a sourcing pass.  750h+ | Talk  04:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Could we supply any images to the article? Even if they are the closest bit related that would illustrate the article well.  750h+ | Talk  04:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Verdict

edit

Overall this is a fine article, but the extremely minor concerns need to be addressed above. After that, I'd be happy to pass the artie for WP:GA.

OK. So pictures are not a requirement for GAs, so I will pass this article even before you add them. Congrats!  750h+ | Talk  14:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.