Talk:2023–24 FIS Alpine Ski World Cup

Tables

Dear Marbe166 I suspect that you have sidebars hidden in Wikipedia (Main menu or tools) or simply a smaller page that does not display 100%. With standard use, i.e. the side menu is turned on (as if the user was using the website for the first time) on both sides and the page is displayed, the table is too small, which means, for example, that the Type is too small or the competition date is too narrow. Please check it. Gro456 (talk) 09:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Edits

Dear Marbe166, It's disruptive if someone edits everything substantively correctly and doesn't mislead anyone, while you have to do your own thing with such issues, instead of leaving it to the editor who introduces the sources. This disrupts the unity of the site. I understood your explanation in the past to divide the players into several sections, because it would be easier to edit the classification later, but you didn't bother with editing the classification at all. Even if there were some other issues missing after individual competitions, you only edited the issues that bothered you, instead of making other correct changes that would affect the development of the website and its substantive whole. You also looked at the tables only from your side, and not the issue of individual users of the article who, if they open the page, other menus from Wikipedia are also displayed, and your changes to the table caused the page to expand by a few lines because everything was so crowded. Gro456 (talk) 10:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

So please don't say that if someone cares about the content of the page and enters data and that it is disruptive, then someone like you edits the issues that only bother them and changes them to their own style - this is disruptive. I would understand it if you entered individual data, statistics, classifications yourself and arranged them this way, because I would respect your work - but not if someone devotes it, introduces it in the same substantive way, and you change it in your own way. Gro456 (talk) 11:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Don't get me wrong, your additions, updates and edits to the page are in most cases not disruptive, on the contrary, they are very appreciated. However, not adhering to the established format, and persisting with using a new format whilst being reverted is disruptive. You don't have precedency on formatting just because you introduced the new info. I am not against developments and new additions to the page, like the maps, which were introduced last season (I think, they are fairly new anyway), and the table with the overall leader changes, which were introduced just a few weeks ago. However, wiki tables are complex enough as they are, and it is therefore better to use one table line per person, makes it much easier to update when the standings change, which, as you know, happens often.

Wikipedia is collaborative, and therefore we cooperate to create it. I would never berate anyone for adding "incomplete" information, I don't know how much time and effort the other person lays on Wikipedia. Marbe166 (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear Marbe166, why do you always have to do it your way, I would understand if you edited the whole thing or if something was substantively incorrect -.- Gro456 (talk) 13:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)