A news item involving 2023 Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 September 2023.
2023 Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
2023 Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why do we have the opinion of Ocampo mentioned in the lead? It is not a place for quoting marginal individual opinions. Also, this person's reputation is controversial, and he has a tendency to call every armed conflict a genocide [1]. This opinion is not generally accepted by most other sources, so I don't think it should be mentioned in the lead. Grandmaster08:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
1. Ocampo's opinion is not marginal, he was elected Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in 2003 for nine whole years, he is a legal expert in genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. 2. "This opinion is not generally accepted by most other sources" Source? 3. "he has a tendency to call every armed conflict a genocide" that's your opinion, and its wrong, btw, you cite an article about his opinion on the Israel-Palestine conflict to back it up, and yet most if not all genocide experts call the current Israeli aggression on Gaza and the occupied territories a genocide, Ocampo being one of them. scapegoat (talk) 01:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion
On September 19, 2023, there was an attempt to rename this article as the "Third Nagorno-Karabakh War". It was rejected based on the fact that the clashes happened very recently, and there was no evidence it would become a full-scale invasion. Now that Artsakh is clearly in Azerbaijani hands, I think it is safe to call it the Third Nagorno-Karabakh War, as it has the significance of being a clear end to the conflict. Game2Winter (talk) 22:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The second source does not say "Third Nagorno-Karabakh War", it says "a third Nagorno-Karabakh war", which is not the same. The sources are also rather obscure, and the first one is an advocacy group, not a news publication. signed, Rosguilltalk03:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The Second Nagorno-Karabakh War was not referred to as the "second Nagorno-Karabakh War" in most news sources either. From a Google search, nearly all of the sources that have that explicit name were written after the Wikipedia page was created, and most seemed to have taken that name directly from the Wikipedia page. Game2Winter (talk) 22:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
That is in fact an argument for retitling that article, and I believe I argued as such in all relevant discussions for that page. signed, Rosguilltalk23:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Articles of references 76 and 77 do not mention Russian Federation. How can it be claimed that "Azerbaijan and Russia ignored calls from various countries and international organizations to restore freedom of movement to Armenia through the corridor."? OstwaldAndre (talk) 22:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 September 2024
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please do not make us do the work of writing the content. Bunnypranav (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)