Talk:2024 F1 Academy season

Latest comment: 7 months ago by LouisOrr27 in topic Sponsors

Feedback from New Page Review process

edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lia Block

edit

Have began working on Draft:Lia Block. Editions and feedback welcome. LouisOrr27 (talk) 17:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sponsors

edit

Should main livery sponsors (other than the 10 F1 teams) be listed in the table? MSport1005 feels strongly they should not, but multiple people have added them in. It's worth reaching a consensus on the talk page that can be referenced either way. Cerebral726 (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

They disagree to include livery sponsors but there's a footnote for Emely de Heus on Red Bull. Seems contradictory to me. 2001:D08:1B94:523A:2415:6ED:B9AB:F6BF (talk) 14:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's probably to avoid confusion with Red Bull's F1 teams. Mind you, I didn't add the footnote, and feel it could be replaced with a hidden comment. Sponsors are purely trivial – and they're also nothing new. Even in NASCAR, IndyCar or Supercars (where they get utmost importance, and are sometimes listed on official documents along with driver, team and car) we do not include them. MSport1005 (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I did that as a compromise to not add the sponsors directly to the table. Fine if you wanna remove it. However, I think Ferrari Driver Academy should be mentioned as a note next to Aurelia Nobels if possible. D4R1U5 (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Although part of the Ferrari driver academy, Nobles isn't being supported by or running a Ferrari livery. LouisOrr27 (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@D4R1U5:   Done MSport1005 (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Great, thanks. D4R1U5 (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Norgz1328: Please join the discussion here about the edit you wanted to make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerebral726 (talkcontribs) 16:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Given how prominent the title sponsors are on television graphics and commentary, basically being treated as the team name, should we consider adding a 'livery' column or something similar to the driver entry list, to help with identification? Romero13 10:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so. Wikipedia shouldn't be an indiscriminate collection of information, and the entry list isn't intended as a 'spotter guide'. The official results on the website only mention driver, team and number – these sponsor logos and "SPONSOR by TEAM" on the graphics seem to just be a TV thing to generate interest. MSport1005 (talk) 00:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why is the "Supporting team" column included then? It is not included in other series such as F2 for drivers in academies and with cars with a "special" livery.
This is a genuine question and is not meant rhetorically or in a provocative manner (I felt like I needed to clarify given the heated discussions in this talk page) Romero13 (talk) 15:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
F2/F3 drivers who run a teams livery are just a member of that teams academy. In F1A all F1 teams are required to support a driver and have their livery on a car. The driver is directly supported by them which is unique to F1A, see for more details. LouisOrr27 (talk) 16:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alphabetical

edit

@RxxingAddict: Regarding this edit, I believe alphabetical order by Team by far makes the most sense for the entries list. Why did you change it back to this seemingly arbitrary order? Cerebral726 (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Arbitrary? WP:MOTOR always follows numerical order. MSport1005 (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Looking at 2024 World Rally Championship and 2024 Formula One World Championship and 2024 NASCAR Cup Series, it seems the tables are ordered first by alphabetical team. I'm happy for the individual drivers to be ordered by number within their teams, but the teams being furthest to the left seem to always be alphabetical. Cerebral726 (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agree, teams should be listed in alphabetical order, with drivers listed in numerical order in their teams. Also when it comes down to the wildcard drivers, they should be listed in the order of events that they competed in, so Saudi first etc. LouisOrr27 (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
There's nothing to "agree" here. Numerical order has literally been the consensus forever. WRC (like DTM) is ordered by manufacturers, not teams – NASCAR (like IndyCar) is an American series and follows different criteria – F1 has its own WP structure and the table is noticeably different. You can check the entirety of non-American feeder series from F2 down to F4 and you'll see they follow numerical order. As do FE, SF, WEC, GTWC, ELMS, TCR, PMSC and all major championships out there. Don't waste our time. MSport1005 (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I can "agree" because its my own personal opinion. and that is I think it looks better and makes more sense if the teams are listed alphabetically. I "agree" with @Cerebral726 comment's about this "I'm happy for the individual drivers to be ordered by number within their teams, but the teams being furthest to the left seem to always be alphabetical." LouisOrr27 (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
the teams being furthest to the left seem to always be alphabetical — I'd like to know where you've looked to reach that conclusion. Because all championships parallel to F1 Academy (Italian F4, Spanish F4, British F4, French F4, F4 UAE, etc.), all championships over it (F2, F3, FRECA, FRMEC, etc.) and all the professional series I listed above use numerical order. As did the now defunct W Series. This is such a basic common practice that it feels surreal to be discussing it. MSport1005 (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I apologize for changing it over too quickly, definitely should've let discussion continue before implementing any changes. I didn't realize this would be such a contentious move, that was my error. However, you are not able to say with authority what the order has to be for this, and your aggressive "don't waste our time" is out of line and non productive. LouisOrr27 and I believe that the most logical order is alphabetical, there is precedent at other motorsport entry tables, it's a valid opinion. Cerebral726 (talk) 23:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your argument, after laying it out, is convincing to me. Try to avoid being WP:UNCIVIL next time. I made a mistake, but your aggressive tone is over the top. Cerebral726 (talk) 23:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate your rectification. I'd also like to amend my last edit summary and point out that you didn't actually violate MOS:FLAG. That was a misjudgement on my part and only contributed to my irritation, so I'd like to personally apologise as well. Have a nice day. MSport1005 (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Because all non American racing has Numerical ordering? S (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


@MSport1005: with regards to your comment about MOS:FLAGS, what issue did you have with my (admittedly too quick) edit to the table? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerebral726 (talkcontribs) 23:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

None. My review of your edit was also admittedly too quick, and seeing those flags on a grey background confused me (it reminded me of people adding flags to the "manufacturer" column in DTM articles). Apologies again for that. It's late and my brain is fried. MSport1005 (talk) 23:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the apologies, and for the forgiveness. Happy editing! Cerebral726 (talk) 13:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Conflicting Car Numbers

edit

I've noticed some car numbers have been put as the same for multiple drivers - do we have any sources for who's using which number (so that we can clear this up)? A Doctor Who (talk) 12:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply