Talk:2024 United States presidential election in Arizona

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Arizona / Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Include RFK Jr. in the infobox?

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is justifiable to include RFK Jr. in the Arizona infobox, as he has polled as high as 26% in the state and has achieved ballot access. This is a different scenario than the national page, as here he has ballot access. I thought this would be common sense, but people apparently want to start edit wars because they think that if RFK Jr. isn't allowed on the national page for now that also means he can't be on the infoboxes in pages where he is on the ballot and polling above 5%. laganrat (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concur. While I agree with those that believe Mr. Kennedy should remain off the the main article for now. I do believe he should be added to the infobox in states such as Arizona. He exceeds the WP:5% average threshold. And he has obtained ballot access in the state. He meets the two required criteria to be in the infobox. ThisUserIsTaken (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why are these pages not showing RCP, 538 aggregates?

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why are the state wide polling pages not showing RCP, 538, etc., aggregates? 2607:FEA8:86DE:AF00:94E6:8BAD:E45F:5D4B (talk) 00:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Simply because no editors have added them yet. Volunteers gotta volunteer. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 02:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Swap Primary and General Election section ordering?

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

General election is certainly more notable now. I'm guessing some folks prefer chronological order and keeping General Election connected to polling appendices below but the article would be more useful to readers, imo, if we swapped the two Superb Owl (talk) 21:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Purple State" is neither a Definition nor a Limitation

Latest comment: 15 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We the People do not have a political system that is constitutionally limited to only two-parties. Language such as "purple state" can promote a bias that presumes that our nation has a permanent two-party political system that is required by law. So, at least add a note that some Americans don't support a permanent two-party system and therefore they don't view our nation in terms of blue, red, and purple. The two parties' campaigns are funded by those with business/corporate interests, and that is symptomatic of a corporatocracy. Thank you. 2601:189:4100:EC30:C0F3:B411:43D4:62D1 (talk) 03:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic