Talk:2028 United States presidential election/Archive 0
 | This is an archive of past discussions about 2028 United States presidential election. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Protected edit request on 10 August 2024
 | This edit request to 2028 United States presidential election has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please tag this redirect with {{R with possibilities}}. GTrang (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done If there were possibilities at this point then it wouldn't be salted. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Edit request to complete RfD nomination
| | This edit request to 2028 United States presidential election has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2028 United States presidential election has been listed at Redirects for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:
{{subst:rfd|content=
to the top of the page and }} to the bottom to complete the nomination. Thank you. GTrang (talk) 03:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Edit request
| | This edit request to 2028 United States presidential election has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
RfD closed as refine to United States presidential election#Comparison with other U.S. general elections. C F A 💬 20:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
RfC on R with possibilities tagging
- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Should the redirect 2028 United States presidential election be tagged with {{R with possibilities}} or not? That template automatically detects whether a draft exists, and indeed there is one at Draft:2028 United States presidential election. So, that would be a reason in favor of adding the template.
But the "
Not done" comment at #Protected edit request on 10 August 2024 above says If there were possibilities at this point then it wouldn't be salted.
, which I guess is a reason against adding the template.
So, which reasoning is correct, then, for this apparently controversial change that now needs an RfC?
GTrang (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Why is it a
change that now needs an RfC
? Other than the denied request ten days ago, where has this been discussed? Have you, for example, contacted Pppery (talk · contribs) directly, and reached deadlock? Have you raised a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States presidential elections or the talk pages of any of the other five or six WikiProjects that might be interested? Please see WP:RFCBEFORE: RfC is a process of last resort, not a second step after the first request was refused. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)