Talk:219 (number)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tim Chambers in topic History of 219 on Wikipedia
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on November, 30 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
History of 219 on Wikipedia
editAlex Bellos mentioned that 219 used to be the lowest whole number "too boring" to have its own Wikipedia page. [1]. Also see Talk:224_(number). — tbc (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)