Talk:220th Military Police Brigade

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:220th Military Police Brigade (United States)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • Individual years should not be wikilinked.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • If available, the author name should go first in the reference in the last name, first name format.
   • Current refs 3 and 6 need publisher info.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Overall, a well-written article. I am putting the article on hold to allow time to address the few minor concerns detailed above. If you have questions, you can ask them here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Fixed everything. How does it look now? -Ed!^(talk)_{(Hall of Fame)} 17:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Looks good, so I'm passing the article. For future work, I would suggest putting the author name first in the references, before the title, but this isn't something I'm going to hold the GA up over. Dana boomer (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 220th Military Police Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080622043405/http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/MP/220th%20Military%20Police%20Brigade.htm to http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/MP/220th%20Military%20Police%20Brigade.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229053804/http://orbat.com/site/history/current_week_open/usarmy_reservepoliceunitsonduty_july92003.pdf to http://orbat.com/site/history/current_week_open/usarmy_reservepoliceunitsonduty_july92003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070915125456/http://defendamerica.mil/awt/nov2001/awt110501a.html to http://www.defendamerica.mil/awt/nov2001/awt110501a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)