Talk:24/7 service
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI have run into one or two websites who say they are open '25 hours', is this simply supposed to denote that they never close (similarly to putting in 110% into something)?--Dcsmith 12:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'd simply assume that to be a marketing gag, based on its logical impossibility. MadMaxDog 08:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Year-round service phraseology
edit"24/7/365"
Is this phrase not illogical? 24/7 denotes 24 hours x 7 days a week. So following that formula it should be 24/7/52, correct? 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year? Otherwise, according to the phrase it is "24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year" which breaks the trend in sorting service hours. Luet 06:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Even if the phrase is illogical, it does not make it confusing, I think, and there's no reason why people won't use it. Not our business to change language to fit semantic logic... Ingolfson 01:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Illogical? 7 * 52 equals only 364 days! It would make far more sense to write "8760 hours a year". Then again, neither of those handles leap years -- but writing "8766 hours a year" might be too confusing! How about "24 hours a day, 14 days a fortnight, 26.0887285 fortnights a year"? Ewlyahoocom 04:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- You are missing my point - doing the math above is pedantic (I am not insulting you, I'm quite pedantic myself, often enough), because the "24/7/365" combo is quite easily understandable, and does need to make additional sense beyond that. Lots of phrases are not quite correct, and exist anyway. Ingolfson 05:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I've just thought of something. 24/7 implies that it available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. So doesn't that in itself imply that it is constantly in service, every single day of the year? Unless you go by years, saying one year it's 24/7, the next year it may not be. Which is why it's 24/7 instead of just 24, I guess. Any thoughts?Luet 00:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think so, since 24/7 may often (for non-IT businesses) only cover regular days, that is, not counting holidays (i.e. Christmas). In the IT world, 24/7 is more often connected to 365 days by year availability. DokReggar (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- More importantly why is it written "24/7" which equals ≈3.43 ? Mathematically the correct form should be "24×7". Based on how it's pronounced "twentyfour-seven" it should be written "24-7", (unless you actually pronounce it "twentyfour-per-seven", "twentifour-slash-seven", or "twentyfour-devided-by-seven"). ;P Qvasi (talk) 09:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- "24-7-365" is redundant, unless you are talking about a period of just under 7 years (365 weeks). If you want to communicate year-round availability, "24-365" suffices. 198.70.193.2 (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Notation ?
editIs there any authoritative answer on whether the correct notation is 24/7 or 24x7 ? 17:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.2.238.180 (talk)
My air talk iPhone àsking for a code
editAsking for a code 2600:1700:344D:AC10:C477:FDC0:5D6D:7222 (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- So what code I put in 2600:1700:344D:AC10:C477:FDC0:5D6D:7222 (talk) 04:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Maine 31 July ko 300 plus 300 ka transaction kiya tha per Jahan per bheje the vahan pahuncha Nahin
editMaine 31 July ko 300 plus 300 ka transaction kiya tha but Jahan per bheja vahan pahuncha 2409:4089:DECA:8E2A:0:0:6D8B:EB14 (talk) 07:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Maine 31 July ko 300 plus 300 ka transaction kiya tha but Jahan per bheja 2409:4089:DECA:8E2A:0:0:6D8B:EB14 (talk) 07:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)