 | This article was nominated for deletion on 30 May 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability
editThe fact that this number appears in 2 core sequences of the OEIS and 192 nice sequences contradicts the supposed non-notability of this number, in my opinion. Anton Mravcek 21:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
although originally, yes, this page deserved deletion, there is now enough information to keep it. Jesterjester 03:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
For some unknown reason 243 (number) redirects here. I have no idea why, nor how to fix that (or to understand why...). But it seems to me that it's pretty incorrect.
Also 244 redirects here - I'm a differnt person but I also don't know how to fix... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.118.127 (talk) 22:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the concern, but this is correct. 244 is not currently considered notable enough to receive its own article, thus information on 244 is rolled up into the article for the factor of ten below it. Jesterjester (talk) 21:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)