Talk:2GB

Merge Discussion: Jason Morrison article

This should be added to 2GB. This guy works there on the air. (unsigned, comment by JanelleNills)

• There are a lot of broadcasters who have their own pages in wikipedia (see the category Australian radio personalities), perhaps this article simply needs more information. After all, broadcasters have their own careers which often move between stations, so such information can't really be tied to a specific station's wiki page. Also, information about a radio station should be distinct from biographical information about people who are working there at this time. - Therandom 11:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Logo

The 2GB logo is quite large; perhaps someone might want to resize it? Mind the gap 01:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Controversy

Is there any objections to including the Codes of Practice, the ACMA and Alan Jones on here? They have been fairly pivitoal events for 2GB. Jacketed 01:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm an avid 2GB listener (to dispel anybody calling me a nutty pinko) and think It should be. It's earned the station nation wide attention.

Alan Jones PM Lies comment

A sustained multimedia attack by diverse government supporters on a non 2GB event has temporarily impacted on advertising for 2GB, but this hasn't yet impacted quarterly earnings and may never be substantiated. The issue impacts Alan Jones but not 2GB. Probably best to post any issues relating to it on Jones' page. IMHO. An article on the issue, with links, is at http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/rudd_says_of_jones_what_labor_says_of_rudd/ DDB (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality!!

God, how can an article on a radio station end up being disputed for its neutrality! Come on. It's not that hard to put up a reasonable article on this!

Fair use rationale for Image:2gb.jpg

Image:2gb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 00:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

now cross a horse with a donkey you got an ass now cross that with a camel you got an ????? now cross that with a brohman you get a brahman next crossssss??????? big marn.Bold text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.179.143 (talk) 05:29, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2GB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231171445/http://acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib100059/stations_book_electronic_edition.pdf to http://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib100059/stations_book_electronic_edition.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100430151412/http://www.commercialradio.com.au/index.cfm?page_id=1009 to http://www.commercialradio.com.au/index.cfm?page_id=1009

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Non alcoholic beer & wine

Why can a 14 year old kid buy today non alcoholic beer & wine from coles & Woolworths. Surely by aged 14 it trains there brain to receive a acquired taste up to 18 , so by 18 it’s just natural to drink the real stuff then they turn into alcoholic’s non alcoholic items should not be allowed to be sold to minors 49.186.80.135 (talk) 09:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)