Talk:32nd Air Expeditionary Group

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

32d Air Operations Group

edit

The beginning of this article was the transfer of materials from the article on the 32d Air Operations Group, which was a former designation of this unit. Article history prior to 8 Apr 2012 can be found at that page. Lineagegeek (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have deleted the red links for these four squadrons. They were newly consituted for assignment to the 32d TFW and never became fully operational before inactivating. They have not been active since. I can forsee no real chance that the units are notable enough to merit their own articles. Lineagegeek (talk) 23:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 32nd Air Expeditionary Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply