Talk:32nd Infantry Division Triglavski/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 10:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox; all good
• Section 1;
  • Divizijski đeneral; mention the equivalent common rank
    • Done.
• Section 2;
  • Armijski đeneral; mention the rank in general prose
    • Done.
• Section 3;
  • Krka river; put italics on Krka
    • It is the name of the river, so it is not considered a foreign word for the purposes of using italics.
  • had de-trained?
    • arrant hyphen, fixed.
• 23.7% confidence, violation unlikely.
• Access dates for Tomasevich, Jozo (1975) and U.S. Army (1986) [1953] are missing.
  • Not needed unless the target doc changes, which they don't.

Marvelous work PM, almost flawless. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Krishna! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)