Talk:33 (Battlestar Galactica)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Fourthords in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Issues:

  • Top: Add the DISPLAYTITLE template
  • Infobox: Reference for Cinematography
  • Infobox: Add "running time" to the infobox
  • Infobox: Add production code for infobox
  • Lede: Remove references. They are already in real sections. In summary, no ref needed
  • Lede: Must summarize every section in article
  • Writing: Merge section with "Production"
  • Reception: Unlike United Kingdom; to Television in the United Kingdom instead
  • References: Ref. 2 - Don't need 2 TV Guide notes

Good work. On hold. TBrandley 12:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm not the nominator, but I have worked on the article a great deal. Please forgive me if my efforts here are contrary to procedure.
  • I added a {{DISPLAYTITLE}} to the top of the article.
  • As for the Cinematography reference, Stephen McNutt's role is discussed and cited in the first paragraph of the Production section. Since it's cited there, like the rest of the information in the infobox, I didn't think it needed a citation in the infobox.
  • I referred to my rip of the episode from the official DVD release and added that time, though I have no official citation for it.
  • I ask that you trust me when I say that the production codes for BSG episodes is an issue I went around and around on. There are no reliable sources (that I or any other editors have found) that provide production codes for this or any BSG episodes. Lacking reliable sources for citing such a number, I removed it from this and (at user:edokter's insistence) all other BSG episode articles.
  • I removed the citation for the writer/director line, but there's nowhere else in the article where the following episode is discussed, and I never found anywhere else appropriate to include it. That's why it's cited in the lede: because it's not cited elsewhere.
  • Oof, I'll do my best. Let me know what you think; writing lede's is my weakest point.
  • I don't understand merging the two sections. The writing took place well before, and is a wholly separate happening than the actual production and "making" of the episode if you will.
  • I think you meant "unlink", and I've done so.
  • TVG citation 2 is showing that the episode "Water" aired following "33", whereas TVG citation 25 is citing the date "33" aired in the United States.
Again, I hope I'm not out of line making these comments and inputs, and thank you for taking the time to review this article for GA consideration. — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:17, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply