Talk:37th Battalion (New Zealand)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 04:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox
  • Some content about the honours in the lead
    • Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • 1941–45 is to be 1941–1945, per MOS:DATERANGE
    • Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia doesn't have an article on Sudgen, so he isn't notable, but the only commander. Reword
    • Deleted Sudgen from infobox, the note (on first mention of Sudgen) states he was only commander of the battalion. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
• Section 1;
  • A.H.L. Sugden -> A. H. L. Sugden, per WP:NAMES
    • Wow, you really do know the MOS! Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • machine-gun; drop -
    • Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • basic context on President Coolidge, type and country
    • Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • the ship captured -> the ship was captured
    • Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • USS Rotanin; to maitain consistency just Rotanin, mention the basic context
    • Done. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
• Section 2;
  • 1942–44 -> 1942–1944
    • I haven't done this one; it is a direct quote from the honours page so I don't think it needs to comply with the MOS. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
• 16.5% confidence, violation unlikely

Excellent article, good work Zawed. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Krishna, thanks for the review, have made edits and comments as appropriate. Zawed (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)