Talk:38 Oxley Road
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Kbseah in topic Proposal to change article title to "38 Oxley Road Saga"
 | This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remove the Nead Citation Box
editI have Added sources to the sources parts of the page, are these sources sufficient to remove the box? Zubin12 (talk) 16:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- These look good. Are there any additional sources available? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Proposal to change article title to "38 Oxley Road Saga"
editBulk of the content here is about that saga. Shouldn't the title reflect this instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jane Dawson (talk • contribs) 02:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- No: I'm assuming that you're referring to the dispute between the Lee siblings. I think that it should stay as it is, as the other sections (e.g. architecture and history of the house and its grounds) may be expanded in the future. Certainly there will be new content to add if/when it is torn down, gazetted, etc., which would be a whole other saga.... Kbseah (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Any Free images of the house ?
editThe image I added in the initial article has been deleted as it was a copyright violation, can someone find an image of the house with a suitable license or upload an image under a fair-use metric ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubin12 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- As anyone could take a picture of the house and license it freely, I don't think a fair use image would be accepted, because any such image is replaceable by a free image. If it had been demolished, then a fair use image might be accepted, because no new free image could ever be created. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)