Talk:392d Combat Training Squadron
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Lineagegeek in topic Transfer to Space force?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 392d Combat Training Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2nd
editI was going to suggest that surely the normal abbreviation for 'second' is nd?
So, why isn't this article entitled 392nd ... ? But it seems that some places (U.S.?) use d instead of nd?
Guess it's my British thinking. Trafford09 (talk) 22:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Merged with 532nd
editNot much for editing actual pages, but the 392nd no longer exists. It merged with the 532nd Training Squadron on 2 July 2012. [1]
Transfer to Space force?
editThe last two posts presume that the Space Force's 392d Combat Training Squadron is this unit reactivated. However, no cite is provided, we can't tell. I think it is likely, but we need a RS that shows there is a connection between the two units. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)