Talk:3 Spoons of Suga/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 15:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Review

• I'll take care of the sample. I've already added "Pink"'s one and this week I add "Easy"'s one either.
• Nothing else. Good work.

Verdict

Well, i've read the article yesterday and now today and all is pretty good. Up-2-standard XD.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

—Hahc21 03:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)