Talk:4-Chlorophenyl azide

Group 23

This page is really well established & there is a lot of good information. The "other names" section in in the chembox is really busy & hard to read, that could be made clearer. The only other thing is that some of the wording is confusing, especially in the intro paragraph. Just a few more rounds of proof-reading could help. Overall the page is coming along nicely. Nicolewonderlin (talk) 04:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I agree that this page is coming along very well. After reading through the page, you were really able to make it clear how rifalazil has many important pharmaceutical applications. The "Uses" section was especially interesting in providing information about well known diseases that this compound can help to treat. I'm not sure if it is necessary to add the section which you include the list/links of tested diseases. You pretty much mentioned all of these except for Buruli Ulcer and Leprosy in your uses. Maybe you could just add a little information about how it is used for these two diseases as well in the "Uses" section but I think this is really up to you. Also, did you mean to include a link to the reference for the CAS number both before the number and as a superscript? Finally, I've noticed that on a lot of pages on Wikipedia, the reactions are indented slightly to make them stand out more. Yours is pretty distinguishable since it is the first part of the "Reactions" section, but this is also something you could quickly do. Other than those minor things, I thought the information on this page was excellent. Nice work!

Criccardo (talk) 21:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #3 This page looks great! The table on the left looks very useful and everything is very clear except for the "other names" section. Maybe you can format it so that each name of the compound can appear on a separate line. That way, it would be easier for the reader to just scroll down and check if the name they are looking for matches your compound. As for your paragraphs, they are very informational and that is good. However, you will need to work on your transitions so that the information could flow better. If you are struggling with that, I would suggest to use bullet points in order to list random facts that cannot be unified in a paragraph. Good job! Lina48498 (talk) 01:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

This page looks very well done! You did a great job finding information on uses, history, and reactions. I found your article to be very interesting especially the potential pharmaceutical applications this chemical has. There are a few things that could be improved. Most of my suggestions just has to do with organization/formatting. The Chembox should be higher in the article so that the heading of the Chembox lines up with the first line of text below the giant heading on the upper left hand corner. In addition, under "other names," there just appears to be a glob of text makes separating the names a little bit difficult. I would try and use a different alignment to distinguish each name. Also, please do not forget to cite where you get your information in the Chembox. Acidity, density, boiling point, vapor pressure, and flash point could all use a citation. Other than that, you did an awesome job. Wchen24 (talk) 03:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)