Talk:41 equal temperament
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 41 equal temperament article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Unsuitable reference
editThe articles at x31eq.com, while well written and thought out, do not constitute a reference suitable for Wikipedia. Textbooks, dictionaries, peer-reviewed journals- even a PhD thesis- would be fine here, but "original research" far outside of more or less mainstream bounds doesn't belong here. Whether or not that is a good thing, that is the way it is. References, or deletions. Frank Zamjatin (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Interval table shading
editWhy are random intervals in the Interval size table shaded or darker than other intervals in the table? Hyacinth (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't do it, so I can't say that I know what the intention was, but I notice that these are the intervals that are most poorly matched to the natural harmonics. Cazort (talk) 19:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Relationship to Bohlen-Pierce Tuning
editI don't see how the 41ET scale on the Tonal Plexus keyboard makes for any kind of approximation of the Bohlen-Pierce scale.
Each step in the Bohlen-Pierce scale equal temperament is 146,3 cents (1902/13). The 5th step on 41-edo is 146,34 cents((1200/41)*5). Therefore, you can consider each 5 steps in 41-edo to be a Bohlen-Pierce step. Jregatta (talk) 23:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)