Talk:49 Chambers
49 Chambers has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 18, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from 49 Chambers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.neighborhoodpreservationcenter.org/db/bb_files/1985EmigrantIndustrial.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. epicgenius (talk) 13:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- ... that the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building's main banking hall was later used as the New York City Parking Violations Bureau's quarters? Source: NY Times 1973
- ALT1:... that the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building's main banking hall was described as "the one real asset" of a nearly bankrupt New York City in the 1970s? Source: NY Times 1979
- ALT2:... that when the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building was converted for residential use, the developers commissioned an essay about its architecture and history? Source: NY Times 2018
- ALT3:... that when the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building was completed, it was the largest bank building in the United States? Source: New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; Dolkart, Andrew S.; Postal, Matthew A. (2009). Postal, Matthew A. (ed.). Guide to New York City Landmarks (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 31.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Spokane and British Columbia Railway
- Comment: DYKcheck may show an error on this page because a copyright violation was removed before expansion. Unfortunately, there's no free image of the banking hall that I can find.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC).
- Definitely expanded by more than five times the original prose, long enough, no problems with neutrality or sourcing. Earwig doesn't pick any plagiarism up. One source behind a paywall, but I accept it in good faith. Only thing left would be a QPQ. In my personal opinion, ALT1 and ALT2 are the most interesting options here. Good job! Roniius (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Roniius: Thanks! I appreciate the review and kind words. I've done a QPQ now. epicgenius (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Definitely expanded by more than five times the original prose, long enough, no problems with neutrality or sourcing. Earwig doesn't pick any plagiarism up. One source behind a paywall, but I accept it in good faith. Only thing left would be a QPQ. In my personal opinion, ALT1 and ALT2 are the most interesting options here. Good job! Roniius (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Good to go. I'd suggest ALT1, it's the most interesting one to me. All of these hooks are very good, though. Roniius (talk) 14:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)