Talk:4th Force Reconnaissance Company/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about 4th Force Reconnaissance Company. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Drunk Military
Moved from my tp
- 4th Force Recon
The unit was deactivated. I was at the ceremony last weekend. It’s been turned into Alpha Co under 4th Reconnaissance Battalion. DrunkMilitary (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@DrunkMilitary: your edit was reverted because you did not provide a reliable source to support. Saying "I was there" doesn't count, it's considered original research. - wolf 18:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@DrunkMilitary: your edits, both to this page and United States Marine Corps Force Reconnaissance have a again been reverted because you have failed to produce a source to support to them. Saying "I was there
" or "I'm in the unit
" is not acceptable as support as it's considered original research. Repeatedly making the same unsupported edits while also refusing to engage on article talk pages is considered disruptive editing. - wolf 22:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Concur with Thewolfchild. Include a reliable source for a claim of reflagging the unit. Lack of reliable sources could get the entire article pulled. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
DrunkMilitary has again reverted in his unsourced changes to this article and Force Recon, all which are accompanied by the same edit summary; "thewolfchild is being unreasonable. He using wiki procedures over common sense. Why would people benefit from deactivating a unit.
". It's a fairly simple rule, but one that every user must abide by, for every edit; all content must be sourced. WP does not allow original research. While continually edit warring and disrupting, he has refused to discuss, or even acknowledge attempts to discuss, though he has already demonstrated his ability to use a talk page. - wolf 05:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)