Talk:5-Tiles
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Fuhghettaboutit in topic Requested move 20 August 2015
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the 5-Tiles page were merged into ETAOI keyboard on 26 May 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Requested move 20 August 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was not moved. As noted, our applicable naming conventions and style guidelines (MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, WP:MOSTM, WP:TITLETM) essentially only provide for all capital letters where the title is an acronym (that has not departed too far from that origin, such as with laser), despite the stylization choice of a company or other organization for their product, logo, brand, slogan, etc.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
5-Tiles → 5-TILES – As the official Website and supported download sources indicate, this is the correct writing. 213.209.66.223 (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TMRULES bullet point #3 (eg we don't captilise Time (magazine)). Also third party sources use lowercase (eg "5-Tiles, The Software Keyboard Targeting Wearables, Picks Up Nokia’s ‘Nav Key’ Inventor As Investor"). Stickee (talk) 00:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. Wikipedia doesn't follow such trademark styles. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 01:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TM / MOS:ALLCAPS. —BarrelProof (talk) 01:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose MOS:TM/MOS:CAPS this doesn't seem to be an acronym -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment were did all this opposition spring from? I picked the lower case title for this because I checked out an independnet source that used the Upper-lower combo. I would be open to seeing other sources though, apart from the logo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest clicking on those blue links above that start with "MOS:", and reading what those pages say. And also checking out WP:AT (including WP:TITLETM). That may be sufficient to explain the opposition. As MOS:CAPS says, "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization" (at least in most cases). —BarrelProof (talk) 06:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. We do not use allcaps solely based on logos. ONR (talk) 06:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.