Talk:525 Lexington Avenue

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Animadversor in topic Title of article

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk02:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
The New York Marriott East Side

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/New York Marriott East Side; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   @Epicgenius: Good article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York Marriott East Side/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zippybonzo (talk · contribs) 06:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


No tags or major issues I can find from a first glance, seems pretty good for all the criteria, but I'll get reviewing.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

@Zippybonzo: Thanks for taking on this review. I appreciate it. Please feel free to point out any issues with the article, even if they're minor typos; I'll be glad to fix them. Epicgenius (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Epicgenius, It’s pretty much a perfect article, today and tomorrow I will deal with the last few checks, but from what I have done so far, it’s likely a GA, if I see anything, I’ll let you know. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 18:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Title of article

edit

This article ought to be retitled "525 Lexington Avenue" since it is no longer the New York Marriott East Side and appears to be student housing now. If it had been the Marriott for a significant period of time or if it had been a Marriott originally, then I could see possibly keeping the name, but as it is, the street address is probably best. Animadversor (talk) 05:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply