Talk:55th Rescue Squadron

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Lineagegeek in topic Merger
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 55th Rescue Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merger

edit

The 55th Special Operations Squadron is the same unit as the 55th Rescue Squadron. There is no point in separate articles. Per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME this article should be placed at "Name (optional disambiguator)". The name should generally be the official name used by the armed forces to which the unit belongs. When a unit or base has had multiple names over the course of its existence, the title should generally be the last name used; however, exceptions can be made in cases where the subject is clearly more commonly known by one of the previous names. The exception does not apply in this case, nor is lenght an issue as both articles are quite short. --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply