This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
Latest comment: 5 months ago5 comments4 people in discussion
Wikipedia is open to the general public, which includes all ages. Wouldn't it make more sense to remove a picture and this inappropriate article by extension? One: this picture is too unacceptable. Two: did it have to be ion color? Couldn't they have used a black-and-white image with such low quality that nobody can understand what's going on? Three: encyclopedias don't normally have pictures. I mean, this is just too much. Pictures of guillotines are fine because they aren't in use. But this? Come on, Wikipedia admins, did you have to allow this picture? If you must keep it, at least replace it with an image what makes it harder to tell what is going on.Primal Groudon (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
69 Le Parfum
{{In 2012 the performer/ perfumer Christopher DiCas, creates with music, a perfume with the name of this position due to the unexpected and uncontrollable eroticism that provocatively radiated and so 69, became the scent with which both sexes are equated erotically; 69 caused mainly because of its name the rage of some conservative societies, and many bad reviews were written before it was even tested. Today it is considered as the elixir that aims to stimulate the relationship and communication of couples for a deeper connection in a modern society that imposes superficiality in all areas.}}
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale..svg){kind=small}
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)