Talk:69 Squadron (Israel)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Lede too short. It needs to summarize the entire article. Place of publication for refs would be nice, but not required for GA.

   Done, lead expanded, added location for refs where available. Poliocretes (talk) 12:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

   Cites not normally required in lede unless making statements or claims not backed up by the main body; don't think that's the case here. I combined the first two paragraphs to improve flow.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

   Right, I removed all cites from the lead, save for one which references a quote not repeated in the body. Poliocretes (talk) 09:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Might move the Catalina picture up to the relevant section, probably best on the left side.

   Done. Poliocretes (talk) 12:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: