Talk:7.62×53mmR

values

bullet diamter in the box on the right ist different to bullet diameter mentioned in the text (see comparison between x53 and x54) neck diameter in the box on the right is different from neck diameter in the drawing

Agree. There needs to be consistency here. See my comment below. 58.165.123.47 (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.cip-bp.org/index.php?id=tdcc-telechargement
  • In .223 Remington on 2011-05-20 21:28:33, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In 10mm Auto on 2011-05-23 02:08:47, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In .223 Remington on 2011-05-31 04:44:11, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In .325 WSM on 2011-05-31 12:36:32, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In 10mm Auto on 2011-06-01 01:40:56, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In 5.45x39mm on 2011-06-19 14:22:29, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In 6.5x68mm on 2011-06-19 20:34:20, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Bullet diameter

The current text states: "Bullet diameter: 7.83 mm (54R: 7.92)". According to the diagram entitled Cartridge dimensions, however, the diameter of the 7.62x53mmR bullet is 7.85 mm. According to the table in the right hand column entitled Specifications, the diameter of the 7.62x53mmR bullet is 7.85 mm. I'm assuming on this basis that the correct value is 7.85 mm and am amending the text entry accordingly. If, in fact, the diameter of the 7.62x53mmR bullet is 7.83mm, then a reliable source needs to be cited, and all three entries in the article need to amended accordingly and consistently. 58.165.123.47 (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

I provided links to the relevant current C.I.P. TDCC's in the external references section. These PDF data sheets contain the G1 rulings that express the maximum bullet diameters for these two cartridges. It might be hard to accept for some editors from non C.I.P. member states that these maximum diameters have the status of binding law for all civilians in C.I.P. member states. Finland and Russia are both C.I.P. member states and it will be hard to get a more reliable source than the law in these countries. Only governmental organizations, like military and police forces and other firearms bearing public power agencies, from the C.I.P. member states are legally exempted from having to comply with C.I.P. rulings. This does not automatically imply that all firearms and ammunitions used by governmental organizations in C.I.P. member states are not C.I.P. compliant, since those organizations often choose to self-impose the relevant C.I.P. standards for their service firearms and ammunition.--Francis Flinch (talk) 10:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 7.62×53mmR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hL1iFuL0?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cip-bp.org%2Findex.php%3Fid%3Dtdcc-telechargement to http://www.cip-bp.org/index.php?id=tdcc-telechargement

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:21, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)