Talk:707 17th Street

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Photos would be really helpful for this article.

Expansion beyond a simple stub could begin perhaps with a bit of the history of the building and motivations for its commissioning, and discuss that process -- we're likely to find the details you need for the whole article in whatever sources have that information, up to the date of the source's publication. NoDepositNoReturn (talk) 08:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 707 17th Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply