Talk:70th United States Congress

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move

edit

All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community. I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Senate

edit

This article states that the senate was still mostly appointed by state legislatures. This had long since past due to the ratification of the 17th amendment. Can someone address this or explain why this article does not mention this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.74.244.45 (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 70th United States Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply