This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Polymath03 Changes on this date went far beyond the description of the changes and many were not called for.
Insertion of unneeded blank spaces in the infobox does nothing but use server space
The linked terms in the lead (and the body for that matter) are appropriately linked. Also, even if there were a strong reason to use F-100 Super Sabre, not North American F-100 Super Sabre, the preferred method would be to use a redirect, rather than a "piped" link. I.e. [[F-100 Super Sabre]], not [[North American F-100 Super Sabre|F-100 Super Sabre]]. This applies elsewhere, and looks a bit like WP:IDONTLIKEIT.
You eliminated a number of useful links for apparently no reason.
I've restored other edits you made. Also, I put your change in the External links section into an appropriate format.
User:Lineagegeek Thanks for letting me know -- had no idea the infobox blank spaces were kept, rather than auto-stripped. For future reference, could you point me to an example of a non-LEADLINK-compliant lead? I'm apparently mistaken on what constitutes too many links. Polymath03 (talk) 04:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
