This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
JSF has nothing to do with 750NAS - which is an observer training squadron, training officers for rotary craft - not fixed wing. As to how funding cuts have effected "effectiveness" of the Squadron, I would move that it hasn't. 750 is a training squadron as indicated by its 7xx type. Any speculation about combat effectiveness should be directed elsewhere. Stuart Harland (talk) 12:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This list seems incomplete. I can't actually add to the article without a lot of digging about, since my source is unpublished, but it lists the Percival Proctor,Stinson Reliant, Grumman Goose, Fairey Fulmar and Supermarine Walrus.TheLongTone (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
.svg)
