Talk:76th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by EnigmaMcmxc in topic GA
 | 76th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Division Patch
editI've come across this before (80th division page) where a photo of the patch is replaced with a drawing of one. This was described as policy.
1) Where can I find this policy?
2) Why the preference for a representation one more stage removed from reality (usually accurate, though the 59th Div's is wrongly proportioned) over a photo of an original article?
If it's real and reasonable, I'll shut up.
Usedtoknowthat (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to note that practically every divisional insignia O have seen, for various nations across the wiki, are SVG files based off actual works. As for policy: per Wikipedia:Image use policy, generally "Drawings, icons, logos, maps, flags and other such images are preferably uploaded in SVG format as vector images."EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
GA
editNicely done Enigma; thanks for the opportunity to work "bogus" into the article too. ;O))Keith-264 (talk) 09:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, and your welcome! EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)