Talk:7 mm caliber
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 7 mm caliber article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Confusion
editThis page is a confusing way of organizing this information. First, a good number of these cartridges are *not* 7mm, but 7.62mm, or 8mm. Furthermore, when listing the calibers in inches, there are several .277", .308" and .311" calibers listed under .284" designation.
Suggest looking into "Cartridges of the World" by Frank C. Barnes or http://www.chuckhawks.com for examples of how to organize calibers in a better manner.
caliber
editSwitch the .276 Pedersen to the 7.2mm section, as it has a 7.2mm diameter bullet (.284 inches). .276 is the distance between the lands of the barrel.
References
editI added a section for references. I think it helps when people have confusion or discrepancy about the actual dimensions. Arthurrh 21:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Size sections
editThis article was broken into several sections to make it easier to find the cartridge people are looking for. The sections are named based on actual measurements, not on terms used in naming, marketing, etc. Please be sure to be factual when changing such section titles. Arthurrh 20:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
6.8mm SPC
editWhy is the 6.8 SPC cartridge under the 7mm page? Shouldn't it be on the 6mm page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dslayer202 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Because it is actually 7.036mm wide. Sorry it took someone 4 years to answer. --One Salient Oversight (talk) 10:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/308Cal(7.82mm)/300%20Weatherby%20Magnum%20pages%20279%20and%20280.pdf
- In .300 Weatherby Magnum on 2011-05-20 21:36:25, 404 Not Found
- In 7 mm caliber on 2011-06-19 21:12:32, 404 Not Found
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 7 mm caliber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100827223042/http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/308Cal(7.82mm)/300%20Weatherby%20Magnum%20pages%20279%20and%20280.pdf to http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/308Cal(7.82mm)/300%20Weatherby%20Magnum%20pages%20279%20and%20280.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
7mm IHMSA
editShould 7mm IHMSA be added? It is probably not notable enough to have an article, but may be a listing here.--Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk|Contribs▌ 18:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
"7.92" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect 7.92 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 29 § 7.92 until a consensus is reached. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)