Talk:81 Words

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Suggest removing "Themes" section

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The section of the article headed "Themes" seems to me to violate WP:NOR. It seems to be an original analysis of the show, not (for example) a summary of outside commentary, which might be appropriate.

I suggest removing the section. At the very least, we ought to remove the third item, Homosexuality in History, which has almost nothing to do with the actual show (the show deals only very cursorily with pre-WWII understanding of homosexuality, and the material in this paragraph doesn't come up in the show at all). -- Narsil (talk) 03:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hearing no objections, I'll remove the section. -- Narsil (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic