Talk:8th Special Operations Squadron
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 8th Special Operations Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editCompletely revised Bwmoll3 (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 8th Special Operations Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225125431/http://www2.hurlburt.af.mil:80/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3481 to http://www.hurlburt.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3481
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Removed material
editI reoved the following from the article;
Wings in the new Air Force were configured very closely to the organization of the old groups and the Air Force perpetuated the history of the 3rd Bombardment Group by bestowing its combat record and history on the newly formed 3rd Bombardment Wing. In March 1950, the 3d Bombardment Wing moved to Johnson Air Base to accommodate the 35th Fighter-Interceptor Wing, which was moved to Yokota from Johnson to perform air defense [1]
Although this is what is stated in the cited source (by a wing-level historian), it is entirely wrong. "in addition to support and service elements, each of these new wings, as a general rule, had one combat group . . ." Maurer, Combat Units of the Air Force3, introduction pp. 12-13 (emphasis added). The rules for perpetuation of history by temporary bestowal of combat groups on like-numbered wings took place only after the groups were inactivated. Ibid. In the case of the 3d Group, this did not occur until 1957.
Additionally, this is a direct (but unattributed) quotation of the source,. --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- ^ "A Brief History of the 3rd Wing" (PDF). 673rd Air Base Wing History Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 August 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)
Split
editThis article is quite long. Part of the unit history is already at 8th Aero Squadron. I suggest splitting off 8th Bombardment Squadron from 8th Special Operations Squadron with the actual split starting with the unit's involvement in the Vietnam War for continuity. --Lineagegeek (talk) 17:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Infobox
edit1. No, not all USAF squadrons have the squadron emblem as the leading image in the infobox. Quite a few have images of the most recent aircraft flown by the squadron.
2. "Patches" are inappropriate for use on Wikipedia. Patches purporting to reflect the approved squadron emblem frequently alter it and usually are cruder renditions than the emblem. The image you labeled as a patch is really one of the squadron's emblem. Many patches deviate entirely from the approved emblem. There might be cases where a patch itself could be historically significant enough for inclusion on the article. (in the case of the 8th and 13th Bombardment Squadrons, the DOOM Pussy image might fall into this category). Emblems are appropriate, and there is a place for them in the portion of the infobox expressly provided – not the image section. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)