Talk:9-centimeter band

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Delete Astronomy?

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An article about amateur radio bands need not have anything about this. The main threat or note might instead concern the .primary user being IMT mobile commas

Disagree Ideally, well rounded articles on amateur radio bands should make note of all notable sharing partners. Radio Astronomy allocations overlap several of the microwave ham bands. Because of footnote 5.149, many countries expressly prohibit amateur stations from causing interference to radio astronomy observations in two parts of the 9 cm band. This merits mention. IMT also merits a paragraph or more because of it's impact, but no one has written about it on here yet. Most of the microwave articles are still start-class. There's a lot to be done to them, but no one has been in a hurry to expand them.
–Sparkgap (talk) 09:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic