Talk:98th Paratroopers Division

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Reservist?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As far as I know, and according to the Hebrew Wikipedia, Division 98 is a regular (non-reservist) division. Can someone find out? -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 13:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Various Israeli media previously reported that Eyal Eisenberg appointed to command of "an elite reserve division [of the Central Command]". Now, after Second Lebanon War, we now that Eyal Eisenberg was the commander of "ha-Esh" division, and we also now from nonsecret sources that its number is 98. Q.E.D. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]Flayer 23:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Name Change

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I propose we change all references to this unit from "Paratroops Division" to "Paratroop Division." In English the singular form of the noun is usually used as the adjective (Eye hospital, horse stable, wedding dress). I would really prefer "Parachute Division" or "Airborne Division," but fear that does too much violence to the original Hebrew. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 01:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agree for "Paratroop Division". Flayer (talk) 05:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The term used for the Israeli unit has always been "paratrooper(s)", not "paratroop(s)". As for singular vs. plural, we will need to examine English-language sources that refer to these units. Does anyone have any on hand? —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 09:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well really, do we want or need a very-literal translation? Translation is after all more art than science. As for plural v singular forms when used as an adjective consider "Wedding dress," "opera house" and "horse soldier." In all examples I can think of, the sigular of the noun is used as the adjective with the main noun only being marked as a plural. Let us let this sit for a bit longer before we change it. I am surprised so few people are monitoring this page. (I bet if we change it we will attract notice.) Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic